GitLab intake
Use GitLab Issues as the request source instead of copying work into chat.
Use GitLab Issues for intake and GitLab merge requests for review while MergeLoom handles the controlled coding run.
Use GitLab Issues as the request source instead of copying work into chat.
Apply rules, context, and validation per repository.
The coding run happens on your infrastructure.
Run tests before an MR reaches review.
Your GitLab review process remains the approval step.
GitLab teams need automation that respects their issue and MR flow instead of moving work into a separate AI workspace.
Labels or status rules decide what enters the queue.
The worker uses repository rules, ticket input, and provider settings.
Your commands run before reviewers spend time.
The MR returns to the normal GitLab review path.
Turn ready GitLab Issues into merge requests while keeping GitLab review as the approval gate.
MergeLoom creates reviewable work in GitLab instead of leaving developers to paste issue text into a private AI session.
Repository checks run before the MR reaches humans, reducing avoidable review churn.
Issues, branches, merge requests, review, and approval remain in the tool your team already uses.
The issue remains attached to the run and output.
Operators can see progress, failures, and review output.
Commands and outcomes are part of the run path.
Review happens in the code host your team already uses.
Connect the tools you already use, give each AI run the right context, validate output before review, and keep the audit trail tied to the ticket.
See the same ticket-to-code workflow from another toolchain, cost, or governance angle.
Start free, connect one repository, add one intake rule, and see whether a real ticket can reach review with less manual implementation work.